Cunningham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
We will discuss only the two grounds of the motion for a new trial which are argued by counsel for the plaintiff in error. As the other grounds are not argued, and there is no general insistence on all the grounds, these grounds will be treated as abandoned. Kent v. State, 36 Ga. App. 209 (1).
I. The 1st special ground of the motion is as follows: “Be*291cause the court erroneously misstated the contention of the defendant as follows: ' (a) ‘The defense is that he was justified in cutting that man as he lay on the ground/ (5) Because the foregoing extract was argumentative.” This ground is too…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. RandolphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Tarver v. DeppenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Riddle v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Nissenbaum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942