Legal Opinion

Fordham v. Fordham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1953No. 16748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

This appeal turns upon the solution of the problem which is concisely stated in respondent’s brief as follows:

“The Act under which the Domestic Relations Court of Charleston County is established (Section 15-1101 et seq., 1952 Code; Section 256-1, 1942 Code) is applicable only to counties containing a city with a population of 70,000. The appellant’s first objection is based on the ground that the provisions of the Domestic Relations Court Act relating to service upon and jurisdiction of a defaulting father or husband (Section 15-1233, 1952 Code; Section 256-46, 1942 Code)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Gillespie v. Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Owens v. SMITHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. City of Columbia v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. State v. FerriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deese v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API