Legal Opinion
Fordham v. Fordham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 1, 1953No. 16748PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stukes, Justice.
This appeal turns upon the solution of the problem which is concisely stated in respondent’s brief as follows:
“The Act under which the Domestic Relations Court of Charleston County is established (Section 15-1101 et seq., 1952 Code; Section 256-1, 1942 Code) is applicable only to counties containing a city with a population of 70,000. The appellant’s first objection is based on the ground that the provisions of the Domestic Relations Court Act relating to service upon and jurisdiction of a defaulting father or husband (Section 15-1233, 1952 Code; Section 256-46, 1942 Code)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Gillespie v. Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Owens v. SMITHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- City of Columbia v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- State v. FerriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deese v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957