Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mills Mill v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 19, 1957No. 17312Published

1DissentLegge, Justice

(dissenting.)

Being unable ft> agree with the majority of the court in their view of this case, I shall record as briefly as may be the reasons that compel my dissent.

In two cases consolidated in the trial court, appellants, individually and on behalf of other taxpayers in Una Water District in Spartanburg County, attacked Act No. 582 of the 1955 General Assembly as unconstitutional; and from an adverse decree they now appeal. With this court’s permission, North Charleston Public Service District has intervened on the side of the respondents, and its counsel have filed a brief, in which…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API