Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Adams v. Rundle

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1968No. Misc. No. 3965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on petition of a State prisoner for a writ of habeas corpus.

Relator contends that his conviction and sentence, resulting in his present incarceration, stem from the ineffective assistance of counsel rendered to him at the time of his trial in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. More specifically, in support of his claim that the assistance rendered by trial counsel was ineffective, he alleges the following:

1. Trial counsel was not appointed or assigned to represent him sufficiently in advance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Mathis v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  4. James E. Fields v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Albert B. Crosby v. Joseph R. Brierley, Superintendent, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Green v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. United States ex rel. Robinson v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API