Legal Opinion · Dissent

Branoff v. Fitzpatrick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1983No. 151Published

1DissentWieand, Judge

A majority of the Court concludes that the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle No-fault Insurance Act1 has overruled, by implication, prior Supreme and Superior Court decisions holding that a person who has sustained personal injuries and property damage arising out of the same tortious act must seek recovery for both in a single action. Because the majority’s decision is contrary to well established legal principles and also because it will create unwarranted uncertainty for litigants and unnecessary burdens for an already overburdened judicial system, I must respectfully dissent.

On December 24,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Page's Department Store v. VelardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API