Legal Opinion

Wright v. Gundersen

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 6, 1996No. 14-94-01098-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YATES, Justice.

Appellant, Crystal Wright, in her individual and representative capacity, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of appellee, Gene Gundersen. In seven points of error, Wright maintains the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because: (1) the trial court failed to consider her standing as executrix of her father’s estate to assert claims against appellee; (2) fact issues exist under each claim she asserted in her individual capacity; and (3) as a beneficiary of her father’s will she should have standing to sue her father’s attorney on causes of action arising…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Haney, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Querner v. Rindfuss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Burroughs v. APS International, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. Ervin v. Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAs, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. Universal MRI and Diagnostics Inc. v. Medical Lien Management Inc. D/B/A BridgewellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API