Legal Opinion

Carrier Engineering Corp. v. International Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Demurrer to one of the defenses set forth as a counterclaim.

1Opinion of the Court

• Bissell, J.

The plaintiff has demurred to one of the defenses set forth as a counterclaim by the defendant, upon the ground that the defendant may not maintain a counterclaim based upon -the loss of profits alleged to have been sustained by it, because it has not pleaded that it has complied with sections 15 and 16 of the General Corporation Law.

*192The plaintiff is a domestic corporation having its principal office for the transaction of its business in the city of Buffalo. The defendant is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Dominion of Canada, but having an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Wood Selick v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Mahar v. . Harrington Park Villa SitesNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Welsbach Company v. . Norwich Gas and Electric CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Welsbach Co. v. Norwich Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flakne v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API