Welsbach Co. v. Norwich Gas & Electric Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Norwich Gas and Electric Company, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Chenango; on the 28th day of January, 1904, -upon an order made at the Chenango Special - Term and entered in said clerk!s .office on the 28th day of January, 1904, overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint, and also from the said order directing the entry of…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, The Norwich Gas and Electric Company, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Chenango; on the 28th day of January, 1904, -upon an order made at the Chenango Special - Term and entered in said clerk!s .office on the 28th day of January, 1904, overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint, and also from the said order directing the entry of the interlocutory judgment appealed from. ' The complaint in this action substantially sets forth that the plaintiff is a…
1Opinion of the Court
Parker, P. J.:.Section 15 of the General Corporation Law (Laws of 1892, chap, 687, as amd, by Laws of 1901, chap. 538), among other things sub? stantially provides that no foreign stock corporation, other than a moneyed corporation, shall do business in this State without having first procured from the Secretary of State a certificate that it. has complied with all the requirements of law to authorize it to do business in this State, etc. Also-that no such corporation shall maintain any action in this State upon any contract made by it in this State, unless prior to the making of such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- W. P. Fuller & Co. v. SchrenkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Thrall v. Cuba VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wood Selick v. . BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Union Trust Co. v. SickelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- American Copying Co. v. Eureka BazaarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Groton Bridge & Mfg. Co. v. American Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.