Legal Opinion

Appeal of Shultz Transportation Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided February 1, 1980No. Trust Book no. 45Published

1Opinion of the Court

ECKMAN, J.,

This is an appeal by the Shultz Transportation Company (appellant), from the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Pequea Township (board), denying appellant’s application for either a favorable interpretation of the permitted uses section of the Pequea Township Zoning Ordinance1 and/or a special exception. Nelson and Patricia Fry, Ernest and Lois Thomas, Richard and Joy Haas, John H. and Kathryn Ebersole, and Irvin and Ruth E. Snyder (inter-venors) have filed a notice of intervention and have submitted a brief in support of the board’s decision.

A hearing to consider appellant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidler v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Soble Construction Co. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. BURGOON v. ZH BD. of CHARLESTOWN T.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Abington Township v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Patterson v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API