Legal Opinion

United States v. Sharp

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 8, 1989No. ACM 27965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Citing United States v. Kinman, 25 M.J. 99 (C.M.A.1987), the appellant argues that it was prejudicial error for the military judge to fail to state affirmatively that he would disregard inadmissible allusions to cocaine use and distribution during his deliberations on sentence. We find no error and affirm.

Consonant with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty at a bench trial of four specifications of stealing funds, totalling approximately $14,000.00, from the RheinMain Consolidated Mess Complex- while working as a part-time bartender. In a pre-trial agreement,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. KinmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. TolppaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. PlottU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API