Legal Opinion

Wirick v. Nance

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1936No. 25801Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

GIBSON, J.

In their argument on rehearing the defendants in error state as follows:

“The facts in this case as stated in the opinion are not in dispute. It is the legal effect of these facts when applied to the rights of a minor which is disputed. If Bertha Pauline Nance had been an adult a different situation would have arisen, and the authorities cited by this court in said . opinion would have been applicable. It is in applying decisions where the rights of an adult eotenant are involved to this case where the rights of a minor cotenant are involved that this court fell into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Winterburn v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Beaver v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Campbell v. WhismanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API