Legal Opinion

Kushner v. McGinnis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 1935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

These two actions of tort were tried together by a judge of the Superior Court without a jury. The two plaintiffs are husband and wife. The wife’s action is to recover damages for personal injury to herself. The husband’s action is to recover consequential damages for injury to his wife. For convenience the wife will be referred to as the plaintiff, unless otherwise indicated.

Findings by the trial judge establish the following facts: At the time of the accident the defendant was operating and in control of an amusement device known as the “Dragon Pit” at Revere Beach. “A patron upon admission…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grace v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Blanchette v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Hooker v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Sullivan v. Ridgway Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sharon v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Sandler v. Commonwealth Station Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Alden v. Norwood Arena, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Kergald v. Armstrong Transfer Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API