Commonwealth v. Doria
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANDERINO, Justice.
In 1960, appellant, who has no other criminal record, was convicted of obtaining a loan under false pretenses and of fraudulent conversion. Post-verdict motions were argued and denied, and on appeal, the conviction was affirmed by the Superior Court. Commonwealth v. Doria, 193 Pa.Super. 206, 163 A.2d 918 (1960). A petition for allowance of appeal from the Superior Court to this Court was filed and subsequently denied by this Court. Appellant paid fines of $150 on each count, thereby completely complying with the judgment of sentence.
On May 30, 1974,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. SheehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ulmer v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AhlbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. AhlbornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.