Legal Opinion

Camille's Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1969No. Civ. 26320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

By petition for writ of mandate Camille’s Corporation and Peter Zane seek to compel the superior court to dismiss a personal injury action in which they are two of several defendants. It is contended that because plaintiff, Bernard B. Schnitzer, failed without legal excuse to bring the action to trial within five years, his action must, as a matter of law be dismissed under Code of Civil Procedure section 583.

Section 583, as relevant here, provides that “Any action . . . shall be dismissed . . . unless such action is brought to trial within five years . . . except where the parties have filed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bella Vista Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Smith v. Bear Valley Milling & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borglund v. Bombardier, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Lazelle v. LoveladyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Nunn v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API