Legal Opinion

Garity v. Donahoe

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 31, 2020No. 2:11-cv-01805Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 Garity, Case No. 2:11-cv-01805-RFB-CWH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 Donahoe, 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Attorney Consultations (ECF No. 15 484), Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59 (ECF No. 493), 16 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct Order (ECF No. 494), Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File 17 Supplemental Brief (ECF No. 500), Plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to Reply (ECF No. 503), 18 and Plaintiff’s Motion for Ruling…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Enrique Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles Darryl Gates, Police Chief John Schiffner John BackusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API