Legal Opinion

Morrical v. Zenon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. 92C-12343; CA A86694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner filed 55 claims for post-conviction relief. The post-conviction court dismissed the claims, finding that the petition was frivolous and filed in bad faith. The court awarded attorney fees to defendant under ORCP 17 C (1993)1 and ORS 20.105(1). Petitioner assigns error only to the award of fees, arguing that the court failed to make the analysis of bad faith under ORS 20.105 required by Mattiza v. Foster, 311 Or 1, 10, 803 P2d 723 (1990).

However, even if petitioner is correct that the court failed to make sufficient findings under ORS 20.105, it also cited ORCP 17 C (1993) as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Toney v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conley v. KCA Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API