Legal Opinion

Toney v. Armenakis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 1996No. 94C-13579; CA A88030PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Petitioner appeals from an award of attorney fees under ORCP 17. We affirm.

On November 11, 1994, petitioner filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief alleging that he was being unlawfully imprisoned. His petition listed a 1977 conviction for contempt that was used to enhance the sentence he is currently serving for another crime. The trial court signed an order appointing counsel the same day. The trial court subsequently granted the state’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On its own motion, the trial court awarded sanctions in the form of attorney fees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Seely v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Plere Publishers, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrical v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API