Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 12, 1865PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from, Clinton District Court. Indictment for forgery. Verdict of guilty with judgment thereon; from which defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

i nRnfnf evidence: vanauce. I. The indictment charges, that the defendant, “ with intent to defraud F. B. Skiff, a resident of Clinton county, did falsely make and forge an instrument in writing, in the language and figureg †0 wjt; 1 Ravenna, Aug. 6th, 1856, received of F. B. Skiff, a promissora not gainst S. *300A. Thompson, hairing date Feby 12th, 1850, of which i am to have $100.00 on hundred dolars when collected, or i .am to pay fifty dolars at the end of thre years from date, F. B. Skiff.’ The said writing, purporting to be the act of the said F. B. Skiff, and to create a pecuniary demand…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. State v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Standish v. DowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. State v. DankwardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API