Legal Opinion

State v. Dankwardt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Louisa District Court. — Hon. W. S. Witiirow, Judge. From a verdict and judgment finding the defendant guilty of attempting to corrupt a juror, this appeal is taken.

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, O. J.-

*7061 *705The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “The said E. T. Dankwardt, on or about the 30th day of January, 1897, in the county aforesaid, one Jacob Heiss, a juror, then and there duly sworn and impaneled to *706try a certain cause then pending and on trial in the district court of Des Moines county, Iowa, to-wit, the case wherein Mary Mahoney was plaintiff and E. T. Dankwardt was defendant, did unlawfully and feloniously "attempt to improperly influence the said Jacob Reiss as a juror in said cause in relation to the same by then and there requesting said Jacob Reiss to see…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. State v. CallendineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. KendigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Peter Piper Tailoring Co. v. DobbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API