Briggs v. Prowell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Suit by appellee against appellants upon a supersedeas bond. Plaintiffs’ right of recovery, so far as the suit upon the bond is concerned, was clearly established, and the litigated issues of fact were presented by several pleas of set-off and re-coupment. There were two or more matters of set-off, composed of separate claims' embraced in these pleas. The evidence concerning them was in sharp dispute. There was verdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which defendants prosecute this appeal.
The first assignment of error relates to the action of the court in giving for the plaintiff charge 1-A.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. TurneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Manning v. Atlanta, B. & A. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN TARPON SPRINGS v. BlissSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. HardwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- State v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Jones v. ColeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.