Legal Opinion
Holtsinger v. Scarbrough
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 22, 1944No. 30506PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The substantial allegations of the petition are set out in Holtsinger v. Scarbrough, 69 Ga. App. 117 (24 S. E. 2d, 869), and we will not again set them out here. That opinion was based on an assignment of error on the overruling of the demurrer to the petition. This court held that Scarbrough was an invited guest, and that Holtsinger owed him the duty of exercising ordinary cafe toward him. The judgment of the lower court was affirmed. Thereafter the case was tried and a verdict for the plaintiff was returned. Holtsinger (whom we will call the defendant) filed a motion for a new trial, which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Holtsinger v. ScarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Southern Stages Inc. v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Rutland v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Colonial Stores Inc. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Southern Railway Co. v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Johnson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Radio Cabs, Limited v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.