Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1955No. 35581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

Of the renewed general and special demurrers to the petition as amended, counsel for the defendant has, in this court, argued only the special demurrer, which attacked the petition as amended for “multifariousness” and “duplicity,” in seeking actual damages to the plaintiff’s property and also punitive damages in one and the same count. The other demurrers, which were not argued or generally insisted upon in this court, will be treated as having been abandoned.

When a transaction partakes of the nature of a contract and of a tort, the party complaining may waive the one and rely solely upon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern States Portland Cement Co. v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Stoddard v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Burns v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Brooks v. AshburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  5. Lipscomb v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kulman v. SulcerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Gardner v. Consolidated Loan & Finance Co. of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Wagoner v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Wagoner v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API