Bliss & Wood v. Couch
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Harper District Court. Replevin. The opinion states the facts. Trial by the court, at the October term, 1888, and judgment for the defendant, Couch. The plaintiffs, Bliss & Wood, bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:_
This was an action in the court below, brought by C. A. Bliss, E. S. Bliss, and B. F. Wood, partners *401■doing business under the firm-name of Bliss & Wood, against I. P. Couch, as sheriff of Harper county, in replevin, to recover the possession of certain merchandise, goods, and chattels, of the value of $3,000. Trial by the court without a jury, and finding in favor of I. P. Couch, as sheriff, and judgment for the amount of an execution in his possession, as such sheriff, of $396.20. The facts in this case are substantially as follows: On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frankhouser v. EllettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Baughman v. PennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Swiggett v. DodsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Morrill v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Turner v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Vermillion v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- First National Bank of Abilene v. NaillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- All Service Life Insurance v. CatlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959