Legal Opinion

In re Hausman

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided February 11, 1913Published

Habeas Corpus: Petition for writ; and Motion to reconsider order discharging rule nisi.

1Opinion of the CourtClemons, J.

Counsel presented to me at chambers a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging the petitioner’s arrest on a warrant of the United States district attorney charging the petitioner with having on February 7, 1913, at and within this district, “unlawfully, knowingly and feloni-ously conceal (ed) and facilitate(d) the concealment of certain opium and preparation and derivative of opium, which . . . was subsequent to the 1st day of April, A. D. 1909, brought in and imported into the United States from some port to the affiant unknown,” and “charg(ing) that said acts were in violation of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API