Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Hommes
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 1999PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
In String fellow’s of N. Y. v City of New York (91 NY2d 382), we held that New York City’s amended zoning resolution regulating adult establishments did not violate their constitutional rights of free expression. This case arises out of New York City’s enforcement of that zoning resolution. The issue is whether the courts below employed the proper definition of “stock” as used in the City’s administrative guidelines interpreting the zoning resolution. We conclude that the lower courts’ interpretation of “stock” included considerations beyond what the City’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Raritan Development Corp. v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hickerson v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Allen v. AdamiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C. v. City of LittletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- People Theatres of New York, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of New York v. 330 ContinentalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People of N.Y., Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wil-Kar, Inc. v. Village of GermantownDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.