Winnebago County v. Harold W.

Harold W. appeals from a trial court order removing him as coguardian of his daughter, Tina Marie W. Harold raises challenges to three evidentiary rulings made by the trial court. First, Harold contends that the trial court erroneously refused him access to the medical records of a nonparty witness. Second, Harold argues that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of prior inconsistent *526statements made by his coguardian and wife, Marie W. Third, Harold contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his prior bad acts. As an additional issue, Harold challenges the sufficiency…