Perez v. Ward
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The determinations of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In these article 78 proceedings, the dismissal of police and correction officers was upheld for their refusal to comply with orders to submit to urinalysis in connection with reported drug use. There is no dispute among the parties as to the standard that governs these cases, and therefore this court need not and does not pass on it: these parties have agreed that a public agency may lawfully order an employee to *842undergo urinalysis on reasonable suspicion of drug use. The central issue…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Feliciano v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Jimenez v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Hoffman v. Village of SidneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Blanco v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Wilson v. City of White PlainsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.