Legal Opinion

Huff v. Langman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1995No. 50A03-9408-CV-299PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

Gregory L. Huff and Susan J. Huff (collectively "Huffs") appeal the trial court's order granting Theodore Langman and Betty J. Langman's (collectively "Langmans") motion for summary judgment. The Huffs raise three issues for our review, which we consolidate into two and restate as follows:

I. Whether the trial court erred in granting Langmans' motion for summary judgment.

II. Whether the trial court erred in denying Huffs' motion for leave to file an amended answer and cross-claim.

We affirm.

The facts most favorable to the Huffs reveal that in August 1992, Huffs purchased by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Collins v. Covenant Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Richard S. Brunt Trust v. PlantzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Erie-Haven, Inc. v. First Church of ChristIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Allen v. GilkisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Abbott v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Paint Shuttle, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. LewellenIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hefty v. All Other Members of the Certified Settlement ClassIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Pitman v. PitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API