Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Poole Truck Line

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1997No. CA 96-911Published

1Opinion of the Court

944 S.W.2d 853 (1997)

57 Ark.App. 268

Charles FISHER, Appellant,

v.

POOLE TRUCK LINE, Appellee.

No. CA 96-911.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions III and IV.

May 14, 1997.

Zan Davis, Little Rock, for Appellant.

Robin Nix, Jonesboro, for Appellee.

ROAF, Judge.

The appellant, Charles Fisher, was employed as a truck driver by the appellee, Poole Truck Line (Poole). Fisher was denied workers' compensation benefits when the Commission found that he was not performing "employment services" when he was injured while transporting in his own automobile the results of a physical examination that Poole had…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Farmland Insurance Co. v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Albert Pike Hotel v. TratnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Fisher v. Poole Truck LineCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API