Legal Opinion
Boyles Galvanizing & Plating Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1967No. Nos. 8410, 8411PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
Boyles Galvanizing & Plating Company (Boyles) obtained a judgment against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) in an action on a surety bond tried to the court without a jury. Both parties have appealed. The principal issues on appeal concern a default judgment entered against Hartford’s principal, Indiana Steel Tank Corporation (Indiana Steel), whether Hartford as a surety was released by lack of notice of its principal’s default, and the proper amount of the judgment.
The record shows that Indiana Steel had contracts to erect steel towers for the Federal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitson v. Wetherbee Electric CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emanuel M. Glaros, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. H.H. Robertson Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Janeral L. Holley, Cross-Appellee v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Tate v. County of MonroeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Morgan v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Black v. J.I. Case Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.