Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Petrocelli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 14, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from her employment as a bookkeeper after she threatened to “get” a co-worker and “punch [her] teeth out.” The record indicates that claimant was reprimanded earlier that day for harassing the same co-worker and was admonished to refrain from such conduct. Substantial evidence supports…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MacFarland v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of GermainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of MatolkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of ShivpalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003