Legal Opinion
Jaskolski v. Daniels
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 2009No. 45A04-0810-CV-588PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1
Joseph Jaskolski and the National Insurance Crime Bureau ("NICB") bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of their Petition for Certification under the Federal Employees Lia bility Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1998, commonly known as the Westfall Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (2009). The Westfall Act provides that the remedies available under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") 2 in civil actions against the United States shall be exclusive. 28 U.S.C. § 2679(a). That is:
injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferreira v. City of BinghamtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Monsanto Co. & Monsanto Technology LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Monsanto Co. & Monsanto Technology LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Jaskolski v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Vance v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024