Legal Opinion
W. C. Howard & Co. v. Parks
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 13, 1892No. 44PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEAD, Associate Justice.
This is a suit, under the statute, for the trial of the right of property in certain machinery and live stock, which were owned by. one W. F. Bachman and transferred by him to O. F. Parks. A short time after this transfer, appellants W. C. Howard & Co. sued out a writ of attachment against Bachman and had the same levied upon the property transferred to Parks as aforesaid. . Parks filed his claimant’s bond as required by law, with I. L. Dunn and C. A. Arnold as sureties, which bond was dated April 14, 1885.
In the issues between the parties in the suit for the trial of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Panhandle National Bank v. EmeryTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- W. F. Stewart & Co. v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Fort Worth Publishing Co. v. Hitson & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Slaughter v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- McAlpin v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1857
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Stein v. McAuleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Walden v. LockeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Watt v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- First National Bank v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.