Legal Opinion

Riemers v. Hill

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2016No. 20150276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ !]• Roland Riemers appealed from a judgment awarding him $8,245.87 from Heidee Hill for unpaid rent and property damage and ordering him to pay Ashley Roesler $10,164 for abuse of process. We conclude the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the liability issue of the abuse-of-process claim. We affirm in part and reverse the summary judgment on liability for the abuse-of-process claim and remand for further proceedings on that claim. .

I

[¶2] In August 2013, Riemers sued Heidee Hill, her husband, Jason Hill, and her three children, Hannah Hill,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Barbie v. Minko Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Stoner v. Nash Finch, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. PHI Financial Services v. Johnston Law OfficeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Dahms v. Legacy PlumbingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Klein v. SlettoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Dieterle v. Dieterle n/k/a HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API