Barbie v. Minko Construction, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Jody Barbie appealed from district court summary judgments dismissing her negligence claims against Minko Construction, Inc. (“Minko”) and Comstock Construction, Inc. (“Comstock”). We affirm, concluding that Barbie failed to present competent, admissible evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact on an essential element of her claim and that res ipsa loquitur does not apply in this case.
I
[¶ 2] On July 2, 2003, Barbie, a teacher at Fargo North High School, was injured when a removable metal mullion bar fell on her as she was standing near the northwest gym…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kummer v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Farmers Union Oil Co. of Garrison v. SmetanaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Newing v. CheathamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Victory Park Apartments, Inc. v. AxelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Missouri Breaks, LLC v. BurnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Collection Center, Inc. v. BydalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.