Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kaye

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1975No. Appeal, No. 306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

Appellant, an osteopath, was convicted by a jury on six counts of violation of the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act,1 and was sentenced to a total of 1 % to 3 years in prison. The charges arose out of two sales of diet pills, each sale resulting in three counts: (1) sale, outside of the regular course of his profession or duties, by a practitioner licensed by law to prescribe drugs;2 dispensing drugs without keeping proper records;3 and (3) dis*508pensing drugs without proper labeling and instructions as to use.4

The first of the two sales was on April 28, 1972, in appellant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API