Commonwealth v. Kaye
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
Appellant, an osteopath, was convicted by a jury on six counts of violation of the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act,1 and was sentenced to a total of 1 % to 3 years in prison. The charges arose out of two sales of diet pills, each sale resulting in three counts: (1) sale, outside of the regular course of his profession or duties, by a practitioner licensed by law to prescribe drugs;2 dispensing drugs without keeping proper records;3 and (3) dis*508pensing drugs without proper labeling and instructions as to use.4
The first of the two sales was on April 28, 1972, in appellant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990