Legal Opinion
United States v. Mosley
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 25, 1995No. 94-0245; CMR No. 30042PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Judge:
1. Appellant tested positive in a random urinalysis and was charged with wrongfully using cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, *301Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. On December 9, 1991, the military judge granted a defense motion to retest appellant’s urine sample for the presence of ecgoninemethylester (EME), raw cocaine, and benzoylecgonine (BE). The convening authority refused to order the retest, and the military judge abated the proceedings.
2. The Government appealed the military judge’s abatement order under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 USC § 862…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. GarriesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. James Glenn, A/K/A James M. GreenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. MukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. ManuelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. NewArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. CoteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. YoungArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. GrahamUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.