Legal Opinion
Pataki v. New York State Assembly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 22, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lahtinen, J.
This appeal involves “[t]he budget process [which] has been the subject of prior legal skirmishes between [plaintiff] and [defendants]” (Silver v Pataki, 96 NY2d 532, 536 [2001]; see New York State Bankers Assn. v Wetzler, 81 NY2d 98 [1993]; People v Tremaine, 281 NY 1 [1939]; People v Tremaine, 252 NY 27 [1929]; Silver v Pataki, 3 AD3d 101 [2003]). Plaintiff commenced this action in his official capacity as Governor in 2001, alleging that subsequent to his constitutionally-mandated annual submission of the executive budget (see NY Const, art VII, §§ 2, 3),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Silver v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Hidley v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- New York State Bankers Ass'n v. WetzlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Turnbull v. Twenty-Sixth Legislature of the Virgin IslandsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006
- Russell v. KendallDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2006