Legal Opinion

Norton v. Everhart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1995PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The State of Tennessee appeals from the Court of Appeals’ reversal of the trial court’s dismissal of Richard Norton’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which alleged that the Board of Paroles had illegally revoked his parole. This case presents the following procedural issues for our determination: (1) whether the Court of Criminal Appeals was correct in holding that the trial court had the inherent authority and duty to convert petitioner’s request for relief from its incorrect form, that of habeas corpus, to the correct form of certiorari and thereafter transfer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. MacHules v. Department of Admin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Fox v. Board of Regents of University of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Canale Ex Rel. Hall v. Minimum Salary Department of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  5. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hogan v. MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ricky Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Neal Lovlace v. Timothy Kevin CopleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Terrance N. CARTER v. Rickey BELLTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API