Legal Opinion

Herrin Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. Carter Produce Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1932No. 4192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the ease as above).

The amount of damages to be awarded was made dependent upon the finding of fact made by the jury to the following question: “3. In what sum of money was the plaintiff’s car damaged by such collision?” The issue as submitted, in effect, asked of the jury a finding of fact as to the cost of repairing the damage done the automobile in the collision, for the only evidence offered was respecting the costs of repairs. The evidence conclusively showed thei automobile was not demolished nor rendered worthless by the collision, but could be put in good condition by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. International-Great Northern R. v. CaseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Sabine & E. T. R'y Co. v. JoachimiTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ZumwaltTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Indemnity Co. v. JamisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Smith v. WeindorffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API