Goodale v. Page
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before DeVore, J., Chesterfield, November term, 1911. Two actions (1) S. O. Goodale against J. W. Page and Bennettsville and Cheraw Railroad Company, and (3) Gillespie Bros, against same. Defendants appeal. cite: Necessary allegations in quantum meruit suits: 3 Strob. 334; 13 Rich. 176; 48 S. C. 307; 33 S. C. 467; 19 S. C. 419.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered 'by
Mr. Justice Hydricic.
The above stated cases were tried together on Circuit and in this Court. The issues are the same in substance, and what is said in disposing of one applies to the other.
The plaintiff sued on two causes of action. In the first, he alleges a joint contract on the part of defendants with himself, whereby he was to furnish the railroad company with crossties at 35 cents each; that he delivered 13,331 ties, under the contract, and -that defendants owed him a balance therefor of $1,833.90.
The second cause of action is based on quantum…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Charleston Cycle Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Pope v. HarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. Industrial Life & Health Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Skinner & Ruddock, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- McGee v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Thomas v. Delta Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990