Legal Opinion

McGee v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 8676Published

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

The above case is before me on motion of the defendant Jerry Hewitt to dismiss the complaint as to him on the grounds “(1) That the Complaint of the Plaintiff *579fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in that said complaint alleges an action against the defendant, F. S. Royster Guano Company, based upon the breach of a contract made solely by and between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, F. S. Royster Guano Company. (2) That the Complaint of Plaintiff alleges in every particular that the Defendant, Jerry Hewitt, was acting within the scope of his authority…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. Industrial Life & Health Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Shaw v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Skinner & Ruddock, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Goodale v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API