Legal Opinion

Hale v. Fraley's, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This workers’ compensation case presents an appeal by Defendant-employer and its insurance carrier of an award of thirty-five percent (35%) permanent partial disability to the body as a whole in favor of Plaintiff Carl Edward Hale, Sr. The amount of Plaintiff’s disability is not disputed; rather, Defendants contend Plaintiff is not entitled to Tennessee workers’ compensation benefits because (1) he did not enter into a contract of hire in Tennessee, and (2) he made a binding election to receive workers’ compensation benefits under Virginia law.

Defendant Fraley’s, Inc.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BE & K, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hale v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eadie v. Complete Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Nichols v. JACK COOPER TRANSPORT CO., INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Bradshaw v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API