Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Mitten

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1932No. Civil No. 3076PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action by P. R. Mitten and C. A. Mitten, as taxpayers of Maricopa county, brought to enjoin the board of supervisors of said county from carrying out a contract for the county advertising, publications and printing for the year 1931, entered into by the board with Sidney P. Osborn, doing business as “Dunbar’s Weekly,” a newspaper, who is also made a party defendant. After a hearing upon the question as to the validity of the board’s action in awarding the contract to Osborn, the prayer of the plaintiffs was granted, and the board was enjoined from giving the county printing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Coughlin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Williams v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. St. Landry Lumber Co. v. Mayor of BunkieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Leavy v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State Ex Rel. George M. Jensen Printing Co. v. SnivelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Fetters v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  3. Fetters v. Mayor and Council of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  4. Heiner v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Prescott Courier, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API