Legal Opinion

Neville v. Adorno

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 9, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

In deciding whether an unauthorized deviation from the employment is so slight and not unusual as not to relieve the employer from liability, or of such a character as to constitute a temporary abandonment of the employment “the trier must take into account, not alone the mere fact of deviation, but its extent and nature relatively to time and place and circumstances, and all other detailed facts which form a part of and truly characterize the deviation, including often the real intent and purpose of the servant making it.” Ritchie v. Waller, supra, p. 165; Hickson v. Walker Co., 110 Conn.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hickson v. W. W. Walker Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Labbe v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Chalmers v. Harris Motors Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  4. Scalora v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  5. Dennler v. Dodge Transfer CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API