Legal Opinion

Fourney v. Regester Associates Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County

Decided May 12, 1995No. 94-02325Published

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, J.,

This matter is before me on defendants’ preliminary objections to plaintiff’s amended complaint. In ruling on preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, I cannot consider allegations outside the record. I must accept as true all material facts alleged in the complaint as well as inferences reasonably deducible therefrom. Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, 418 Pa. Super. 178, 613 A.2d 1235 (1992). “The question presented by the demurrer is whether, on the facts *482averred, the law says with certainty that no recovery is possible.” Id. at 184,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Love v. CramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API