Howell v. Amerson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
1. Where plaintiff’s husband sought to borrow a used electric drill from the defendant, which he had purchased approximately two months before, oh which defendant installed a new plug for connecting to the electric current and informed the husband that he might have it, warning “It will shock you,” but thereafter in the husband’s presence tested it himself on a steel table or drum, receiving no shock from its operation, and then handed it to the husband saying “It didn’t shock me; it’s O.K.,” no actionable negligence appears on the basis of a “failure to warn” of the danger…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Daneker v. MegrueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Moses v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Sheffield v. StudorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rigby v. Suburban Rendco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Prince v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Butler v. ShirahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Meriwether County v. CreamerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Colony Insurance v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.