Legal Opinion
Rigby v. Suburban Rendco, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 5, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-572PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
This action is for personal injuries incurred by plaintiff, Homer Rigby, while operating a piece of heavy construction equipment belonging to defendant, Suburban Rendco, Inc. (“Suburban”). Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and the amount in controversy, exclusive of costs and interest, exceeds $10,000. Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
In order to grant a motion for summary judgment, the Court must find that there are no material facts in dispute. Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(c). Similarly, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- American Enka Company, in No. 82-1080 v. Wicaco MacHine Corp. American Enka Company v. Wicaco MacHine Corp., in No. 82-1109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Mann v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Phil Kennedy v. U. S. Construction Company and W. E. Sanders Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waggoner v. General Motors Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Southard v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Dale Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Dale v. CronquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Kassis v. Lease & Rental Management Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Blake Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.