People v. Hollister
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, First Judicial District, County of San Luis Obispó. The following is a copy of the assessment as made by the Assessor: The three tracts of "land were separate and distinct. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:.Action to recover delinquent taxes. In the column of the assessment roll, under the head of “Description of property,” are the following entries: “3,166 acres of land known as the Chorro Eancho, at $4—$12,664; 4,389 acres of land, part of the San Luisito Eancho, at $4—$17,556; 900 acres of land, part of Corral de Piedra Eancho, at $4—S3,~ 600; improvements $1,200.” In the column headed “ Value of land ” is the entry, $33,320. The Court gave judgment for the plaintiff for the taxes upon the first two tracts of land, at the valuation of $12,664 for the first tract and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Sierra Buttes Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sawyer v. Berkeley Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Peers v. ReedNevada Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. C. P. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.