Legal Opinion

People v. Hollister

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874No. 3,501PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, First Judicial District, County of San Luis Obispó. The following is a copy of the assessment as made by the Assessor: The three tracts of "land were separate and distinct. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:.Action to recover delinquent taxes. In the column of the assessment roll, under the head of “Description of property,” are the following entries: “3,166 acres of land known as the Chorro Eancho, at $4—$12,664; 4,389 acres of land, part of the San Luisito Eancho, at $4—$17,556; 900 acres of land, part of Corral de Piedra Eancho, at $4—S3,~ 600; improvements $1,200.” In the column headed “ Value of land ” is the entry, $33,320. The Court gave judgment for the plaintiff for the taxes upon the first two tracts of land, at the valuation of $12,664 for the first tract and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Sierra Buttes Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sawyer v. Berkeley Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Peers v. ReedNevada Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. C. P. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API