Legal Opinion

Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co. v. Whipking

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1930No. 13,754PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint by Rose Whipking, beneficiary named in an accident insurance policy issued by appellant to Wash' Whipking, one of its employees. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The error assigned is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The contentions that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and that it is contrary to law will be considered together.

The policy covered “loss resulting directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injuries and death effected solely through external, violent accidental means”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. LloydIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kokomo Life & Accident Insurance v. WolfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hoesel v. Cain Kahler v. CainIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Van WeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. WilkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Summers v. WeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. OestricherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API